May 26 2010
QUESTIONS!!!
How does Bokononism try to solve the problem of violent, religious dogmatism?
The sole purpose of Bokononism is to point out characteristics of mankind, but with brutal tactic. Right from the start, Bokononism warns its followers that it is based off of lies. Most religions use positivity to get its points across, but Bokononism uses the exact opposite. It points out the negativities of humankind and shows how people feel like their actions are justified because they have religion to back them. Bokononism is a lie, but it proves that other religions are just as untruthful, as well. It shows how beliefs can lead to actions, those actions can lead to disputes, and ultimately death- for all of mankind. Bokononism aims to eliminate the beliefs that religion produces so people won’t have reason to act the way they do; it clearly states that there is no meaning, and that’s what its followers base their lives on. By eliminating the principles, Bokononism aspires to solve the problem of violent, religious dogmatism.
Comparison:
My answer and the Sparknotes answer had a lot of key similarities, but one thing I forgot to discuss is that people search for meaning in religion, and followers of Bokononism accept that there is no meaning to life. This is important because it shows how it tries to end people’s religious excuses for acting violent; if people live for no meaning, then they won’t have the need to be violent.
How does Felix mock the prevailing notion that “evil” is humanity’s biggest problem?
Felix Hoinekkers is a brilliant man that puts his genius to bad use. He was vital in creating the a- bomb, which killed thousands of individuals in mere seconds, and he developed ice-nine, which did result in the end of the world. However, most “evil” scientists who aim to create chaos don’t have the characteristics that Felix has. He’s not strong or powerful, but he acts like a young child. He spends his time assembling toys, fascinating about turtles, and playing games with strings. A man who is so child-like mocks the prevailing notion that “evil” is humanity’s biggest problem because it seems highly unlikely that a man who symbolizes youth could be the biggest crisis in the world.
Comparison:
My answer touched the jist of Sparknotes! However, one thing Sparknotes discussed that I didn’t is that evil often falls in the hands of someone who is morally irresponsible, not evil. Felix is an intelligent individual but he doesn’t have the morals of an malevolent person that fully comprehends sin and applies that compression to their actions.
How does the commencement speech delivered at Frank’s high school graduation mock the valorized status that science occupies as a means to discover “truth?”
The manner in which Dr. Breed gives at Frank’s high school graduation speech ridicules science. Since Felix was the person who was actually scheduled to give the speech but resulted in last minute cancelation, the school had to find another speaker last minute to cover. Dr. Breed and Felix are both scientists, but the kinds of science they cover are so different, probably like their speeches. As Dr. Breed covers for Felix, science often gets covered with lies, like religion. It gets covered so it will seem more believable, but that just creates illusion. I think Vonnegut carried out the speech the way he did because he wanted to prove that all truth is contaminated with lies, even those that are backed with something as valorized as science.
Comparison:
Uh yeah…. I’m kind of confused by Sparknotes answer. It didn’t even talk about truth! What the heck! The only thing that seemed even worth talking about is that people don’t understand why they do the things they do, but that still doesn’t have anything to do with the question. AP!
What does Mona symbolize about the human character?
For some reason, I really liked Mona’s character. I think it’s because I don’t fully understand her purpose in the novel, but I am going to write my way to understanding! Mona is adopted by “Papa” so his popularity in San Lorenzo can be raised. Even from that simple act, Vonnegut is showing how far a human will go to gain success, even if it means taking on an unwanted child. Mona agreed to marry the next president of San Lorenzo because the Book of Bokonon revealed that she would. However, she and Jonah aren’t even compatible; they have completely different beliefs (vin-dit), but she still agrees to marry him because that’s what she was told. Vonnegut pokes at the naturality of humans to do what they’re told, because it’s backed by something believe in- like most aspects of religion. Christians pray because the bibles says to do so, Muslims don’t eat pork because the Koran says it’s wrong, and Buddhists rub a statue of Buddha’s belly for good luck. Why? Because they’re unable to act on their own, without guidance or previous example. Mona commits suicide because she sees the rest of mankind dead around her. Instead of trying to start her life anew, she follows the example of everyone else. This also shows the stupidity of human character to follow other examples instead of creating a new path. Vonnegut uses Mona as a tool to show the idiocy and meaningless of mankind.
